
Re:Vision, an
online community of people dedicated to re-thinking urban space to encourage sustainability, is hosting a new competition that seeks concepts on how to turn a run-down urban block into "a thriving mixed-use area that centers on the family and supports local sustainable businesses."
Reps from the site will then meet the community's leaders, and the result will ideally spawn similar transformations in other neighborhoods. Re:Vision asks competitors to consider green building and sustainable techniques wherever the design allows.
The project sounds fun and new and innovative, but those characteristics mean nothing if the targeted community isn't receptive to change. I'm also wary of projects like these that focus on completely re-vamping a single urban block into some designer's idea of what is hip and trendy, under the guise of creating an eco-friendly spot. It seems that these design competitions are not so much for the community's benefit as they are for the designers themselves, and the notches they can tack onto their belts.
A community could probably benefit more long-term from instituting smaller, long-term changes, like community compost heaps or gardens, than they could from one huge transformation. Change can be good and much needed, but it needs to be introduced in manageable amounts and should benefit the greatest amount of people (or the largest amount of land).
Perhaps the winning idea will make more sense when combined with the winning ideas of Re:Vision's
other contests (with names like Re:Route, Re:Store, and Re:Construct). But right now, it all seems a little too conceptual to actually be put into practice.