The FDA Wants Your Input on Genetically Engineered Animals
.jpg)
Is it justifiable and morally acceptable to genetically manipulate breeds of cats and dogs to make them hypo-allergenic? How far should a meat producer be able to go in his quest for meat with less fat and more Omega3s? How much monkeying should a scientist be able to do a monkey's genetics when hoping to test a cancer treatment?
These are a few of the questions that are (somewhat) up for evaluation by the Food and Drug Administration. Currently, that very same administration is asking for public comment on its guidelines. Those draft guidelines can be found here. A consumer Q & A can be found here.
The FDA currently checks out every new animal drug and animal drug application, now it might not in specific instances. For example, if a bug has been genetically engineered to treat soybean rust any drug then developed for that bug or working in conjunction would not necessarily need to be reviewed by the FDA.
The environmental implications of new animal drugs and investigational animal drugs will also be considered through the new guidelines.
Confused? Yes, it's not hard to get lost in the non-specific specific language of government documents. But if you fancy a look, search Regulations.gov for Docket FDA-2008-D-0394 and comment away. If you feel like having a human explain these documents to you, try calling the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine at (240) 276-9100 or (240) 276-9300.
We've heard about the benefits of 
I've been phasing plastic out of my cupboards for a while now. It's a slow process as I and trying to balance convenience with health and environmentalism. One change that I have made is that I throw fewer glass jars in the recycling bin and instead save them to reuse later. 
Yesterday, the 
With the ever-increasing popularity of greenwashing, it's getting almost impossible to find out if a product is genuinely safe for the environment. What makes it worse is the fact that so many "environmentally sound" products are either hideously expensive or don't really do their job all that well. I can't count the number of times I've found myself wasting way too many paper towels because the 100% recycled ones don't really absorb that much water, putting on twice as much deodorant because the "environmentally safe" brand doesn't really cover my body stench, or asking myself if the added cost of a "green" cleaner is worth the marginally smaller environmental impact. When I factor in the number of companies that use crude packaging and environmental buzzwords to sell me the same old toxic waste, the whole problem just gets ridiculous and I start fantasizing about throwing in the (bleached, non-recyclable) towel.
Today, FDA regulators defended their previous assessment that bisphenol-A (BPA), a chemical used in hard plastics including baby bottles, is safe at the "current levels of exposure." BPA is thought to be hormone-mimicking, and animal studies have linked it to breast, prostate and reproductive problems.
With a new school year, comes the new lice year for schoolchildren all over the country. According to 
The New York Times editorial page tackled the subject of 
A new study has found that one in five ayurvedic medicine products purchased on the internet contained significant levels of lead, mercury or arsenic. The researchers at Boston Medical Center found that products manufactured in the U.S. were even more likely to contain the dangerous metals than those made in India. Lead, mercury and arsenic are toxic at high levels.




